Machiavelli vs. Erasmus Essay

Machiavelli vs. ErasmusI consider that both of these views, to a certain extent and in certain situations, atomic number 18 still relevant today. With almost people, the parts of the population that seek only to gain in their lives, and not contribute to the betterment of society, I would say that the Machiavellian plan of attack would be of better use. Because he is right, a lot of men are ungrateful, fickle, deceptive, reverseers of dangers and eager to gain. With these kinds of people, they will try to take what they can with come out of the closet regard for who they crush, so the only way to hold on them in check is their fear of the punishments they might receive. We obviously dont have to worry almost them killing someone for political reasons like in the times when The Prince was written, but I would say that raptus of property is still a punishment used today.That is the first thing people go for when pursuance punishment or reparations money, possessions or property. I recollect love of country, not necessarily the person rivulet it is the best way to get devotion from people. So I disagree that those people who follow out of love are less reliable. Especi each(prenominal)y right now, as a member of the armed forces, I can speak for myself a many of my comrades that we dont agree with most, if anything, our current leader says or does. exclusively we follow his orders anyway, because we love this country, and that is greater than any personal reason for not following our President. If anyone even tried to use the fear approach, they would never even get elected. That is why they have propaganda and the occasional moneymaking(prenominal) telling all the good deeds they do, not saying who they punished for not agreeing with them. So possibly in a country where democracy doesnt decide the leader, Machiavellis approach might be used, but in ours, I would say only for small portions of the population would it be useful.I say Erasmuss view woul d be more accepted in todays world. We all go to bed some politicians dont follow a lot of the things he lists a good pattern should do. I dont agree with him saying that taking an injury and losing a pocket-sized of the conglomerate might be a better choice. Not taking those injuries, and showing the world that we are a super power and wont take things laying down is the best way to avoid hurt in the long run. But his views on what a leader should be, and how he should treat the citizens of his race Icompletely agree with. The leader should put the good of the people before his own welfare. But I dont think that fight brings all the misfortunes of state, sometimes it is necessary to go to war with those who would bring those misfortunes.I believe that liberals fall under Erasmuss category with just a little of Machiavelli, with conservatives using some of both. Judging from the two views, I would say that the liberals follow more closely to Erasmus because of his approach to peace. Give a little pride and take a hit, avoid war at all costs. These are approaches that, in my opinion, the most recent liberal presidents weve had have used. While the conservatives hit right derriere and went to war. The war might have caused many misfortunes since then, but who knows what might have happened to us if we had done zipper? We used the fear of punishment approach, and I think it worked just fine.So in conclusion, I think Erasmuss view is the better approach on how to view and treat the citizens of a nation. But in that location are some times when Machiavellis approach is necessary, if not to your citizens, then to those who would abuse them.